this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
32 points (97.1% liked)

Selfhosted

40219 readers
1001 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I want to allow certain trusted users the ability to take down my lemmy instance or reboot it or x, y, z actions in case things go wrong or there is a security incident.

Ideally I would want to have some sort of admin interface that's secure and tested and allow these users to have some sort of login and from there have the ability to execute certain actions that could correspond to a "break glass in case of emergency" scenario.

I've been pointed at https://www.portainer.io/ but they seem to have a steep price for the limited use-case that I would be giving it.

I know about some admin interfaces like webmin, but I don't know which one allow you to create very restricted users or just give users the ability to execute some limited pre-defined commands.

Thank you <3

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] Wander@yiffit.net 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Possibly, but it would have to be so severely locked down that it makes more sense to have a web interface with a few buttons that do some very basic actions, including making my phone ring or stuff like that.

[–] MediocrePosts@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I mean.. don't you just make them a user and just give them 777 permissions to the directories you'd allow?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)