this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2024
154 points (99.4% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5239 readers
725 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
154
Germany’s emissions hit 70-year low as it reduces reliance on coal (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 10 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
25 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Despite this fall in coal reliance, the thinktank said, “most of the emissions cuts in 2023 are not sustainable from an industrial or climate policy perspective”.

Müller said: “The crisis-related slump in production weakens the German economy. If emissions are subsequently relocated abroad, then nothing has been achieved for the climate.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CJOtheReal@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 10 months ago (17 children)

100% without nuclear!

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago (4 children)

That's the part I don't get... How could it have been higher while they had nuclear plants??

[–] Some_Dumb_Goat@pawb.social 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

It seems like nuclear started being phased out in the early 2000s, and wind only started getting phased in, in like the 2000s and with a bit of solar getting phased in around 2010.

Fossil fuels seemed to take up more than half of their energy mix till like 2008 ish (?), and only really starting to drop off around 2016.

Although now I'm also kinda wondering what their total energy usage/ production was during that time now.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)