this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2024
39 points (91.5% liked)
Privacy
32039 readers
1533 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
Chat rooms
-
[Matrix/Element]Dead
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The benefit is generally only cosmetic at your end.
As backwards as it sounds, the more you do to try to "anonymize" yourself on the internet, the more you actually stand out.... because so few people go out of their way to use anonymization tools, which are easily spotted.
So what happens is your profile goes into the "People Who Like Privacy" bucket, and you get ads related to the fact that you want privacy.
Bill Hicks really summed this up nearly 40 years ago, ad execs will use any and every psychological tool and path to get you to buy.
They may not be able to create a profile on "you" speficially with your name, address, email, et cetera, but they will be able to create a general profile for "you" about your preferences, web browser, screen size, geolocation, et cetera.
In other words it would be better to not block them and try to blend in? Does this count for DNS level blocks? In theory the ad networks will not see me connecting to them
Some people seem to think that blending in is the best/only strategy to avoid being tracked and profiled. The developer of GrapheneOS advocates for this in no uncertain terms, encouraging users of his Vanadium web browser not to use uBlock or NoScript, yet also claims that DNS-level blocking is the only way to block content without sticking out like a sore thumb. I personally question his assumptions regarding this. All it would take for a big ad broker like Google, Amazon, Baidu to detect this would be for them to analyze their web server logfiles to spot which distinct clients (IP addr. x date x time x User-Agent string x other fingerprints) connect to their front-ends but don't connect to the analytics or ad-network servers during the same page-loading time frame.
One might also wonder whether ad brokers put deals in place with their customers to get read access to these customer's web server logfiles to do the same kind of analysis in exchange for cheaper rates. Or perhaps under the guise of "let us offload you of these complicated analytics tasks, just show us your logfiles and we'll take it from there."
I can understand the logic but… the web is a horrible place with no adblockers
My threat level aim at reducing passive analytics, not active ones