this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2023
71 points (86.6% liked)

Technology

59428 readers
4059 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Intel CEO laments Nvidia's 'extraordinarily lucky' AI dominance, claims it coulda-woulda-shoulda have been Intel::Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger has taken a shot at his main rival in high performance computing, dismissing Nvidia's success in providing GPUs for AI modelling as "extraordinarily lucky." Gels

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago (12 children)

I think it's shorter to name the things Intel did strike gold on than the boats they missed despite all kinda of advantages.

They missed the entire mobile market processor explosion, inevitable as it was since 2009 with Android launch(or 2007 if you want to say they should have seen what Apple was doing and thought they could compete, which if you're an exec at Intel you should have).

They missed cloud computing.

Classic "big company hires/keeps overpaid check drawers instead of those with finger on the pulse". Intel deserves the very little innovation, success and relevancy theyve had post 86.

Bought my first AMD computer this year, an and 6800 Ryzen 7 with an on proc 680m gpu that is equivalent of ~ Nvidia 2050 discrete card. Game over for Intel.

[–] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Intel's mobile on proc gpu does beat AMDs, though.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Not really. It did for one generation, against AMD's ancient Vega iGPU, if you ignore that ~30% of games were buggy or straight up don't even work on Intel iGPUs.

[–] turbohz@programming.dev 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Meteor lake isn't even out yet, so I wasn't counting that. By the time it comes out, the 7840U will be 9 months old and about to be replaced.

Plus tbh I'm hesitant believing Intel benchmarks. In the past I've seen them do things like using much higher memory speeds for their own chips, which for an iGPU is critical.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)