On the one hand you're right, but at the same time here we all are on lemmy leaving reddit behind. You shouldn't underestimate people's willingness to not deal with shitty companies these days

[–] paperbenni@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In the long term, alternative platforms need to be built on something different than outrage and "not being the bad company". In the end, the vast majority of people cares very little about the underlying technology, they just want their content and people to interact with. Mastodon is in decline already, the fediverse shouldn't be a place where people come to say "wow, [company] sure does suck", and then go back to that company if they actually need a piece of information or reach a person that does not know or care what an API or federated protocol is, aka 99% of the population.

[–] Azzu@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lemmy should specifically be about not catering to these kinds of people. People that just want their content and don't care about anything else can stay on reddit/threads.

[–] Raildrake@vlemmy.net 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I see Lemmy and the fediverse more as an evolution of how we approach the web. We should absolutely cater to more casual users eventually, and try to have as many people as possible to leave behind these greedy internet monopolies. We clearly saw that they're not the way to go.

How we get there is a bit of a question mark, it's clear that there's a big push from more involved/aware users to break away from big corporations. This doesn't mean we're building on outrage, just that it was the initial push to get something new started.