this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
15 points (94.1% liked)
Interesting News from Around the World
2 readers
15 users here now
Interesting news from around the world.
Post format
Post title should mirror the news source title.
Post URL
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body.
Icon attribution | Banner attibution
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I have to say that in this case it sounds like Elon Musk has a point. If his court filings are to be believed:
It seems like they fulfilled their legal obligation as the legal counsel for Twitter. “The bulk of the $84.3 million paid to Wachtell on October 27 was allegedly a "success fee" for forcing Musk to close the deal.”
I see no problem with this, a lot of lawyers work on contingency. If the contract stipulated the amounts above the $18 MM in previously owed invoices, they should be paid. Elon’s not happy about the Twitter deal and isn’t exactly known for paying bills that are contractually obligated, so this sounds like he’s trying to claw back as much cash as possible from his dumb Twitter takeover.
So, I don't think there's enough information in this article to determine one way or another. It could have been a pre-arranged agreement where the lawyers were getting a huge payday because they were proposing to accomplish a difficult and massively lucrative outcome. In which case, fair play. It could also however have been that the fee schedule was wholly unreasonable and the managers of the company agreed to it basically because it wasn't their money, and only after it had become solidly settled that it wasn't their money.
Just because Elon Musk is a non-bill-payer and POS in many other respects doesn't mean he's automatically lying when he claims it was the second one. I genuinely don't know one way or another.
I agree that there’s not enough information to decide veracity of Elon’s lawsuit, but based on his history, he doesn’t get the benefit of the doubt. I’d say a key indicator is if the attorneys representing Musk in this lawsuit are his employees or an outside legal firm with a track record. If they’re employees, he’s lying. They filed this lawsuit because he told them to because he knows no outside agency is taking that case for less money than he’d potentially recover. If he’s telling the truth, outside attorneys would be okay taking the case because they’ll get to notch an easy win.
Yah, that's fair enough. He's the boy who cried wolf at this point.
What an odd state of affairs that one of the richest people to ever inhabit the planet is the boy who cried pedophile. Worst timeline, ever.
In what limited time I've spent interacting with extremely rich people I've found them to be pretty much the same cross-section of humanity as in any other grouping. There are some happy people and some sad. Some are insane, some are great, some are stupid, some are smart, etc etc. I thought there would be some notable difference but that doesn't seem to be the case.
I'm still a little sad about how Elon Musk turned out. Somewhere inside him is a happy nerd that just wants to build rockets and electric cars. Plenty of billionaires are happy to just sit back poisoning the water and staying out of the spotlight, and he's not that, for which I give him props. It just seems like right around covid time he took this hard sudden turn into crazy-sociopathic-POS land, his kids won't speak to him, he's aggressively mocking towards all these Twitter engineers who just want to do their jobs, he just overall turned out as a bad person, and I wish it hadn't happened that way.
I think there was an opportunity for Elon to turn out differently, but his upbringing almost guaranteed he’d turn out a bastard. He might be into rockets and electric cars, but that doesn’t mean he actually makes things work, he’s an executive who started life somewhere between third and home. He got his start in Canada when he stepped of a plan with uncut emeralds from his family’s emerald mine. He could afford to take risks and such because his family’s wealth was extraordinary (and built on the exploitation of others, which totally wouldn’t be a recurring theme in companies he runs).