this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2023
769 points (98.7% liked)

World News

32326 readers
765 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fridgeratr@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Guess I should finally try Tidal...

[–] netchami@sh.itjust.works 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (6 children)

Or just stop giving these shitty corporations money altogether and start pirating.

Take a look at these amazing guides:

https://ripped.guide/Audio/Music/

https://rentry.org/firehawk52

And join !piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Personally, I use deemix with Deezer Premium ARLs to download my Music in full 320kbps. Works like a dream. You can accomplish the same thing on Android with Murglar. This section of the Firehawk52 guide explains it pretty well.

[–] Visstix@lemmy.world 23 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Not sure how that solves paying the artists a fair share.

[–] qwazpoi@lemmy.ml 11 points 11 months ago

It kinda does in a way. A Harvard study from 2004 showed that most artists actually get a profit from piracy (when they broke it down pretty much all but the 25% most popular artists sold more records and had more concert attendance).

Basically most legitimate music streaming services have ways of screwing over artists. Most services use a pro rata model that will screw over most artists.

As it stands for right now one of the biggest things hurting artists are the streaming services.

Things that help are services switching over to a fan centric model (SoundCloud is the only service I know of that has done this and I haven't actually seen too much info on how it's actually affected artists) and organizations like MAC and ARA that can affect policies and regulations in the music industry.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)