Technology

59402 readers

3857 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

1690

YouTube Says New 5-Second Video Load Delay Is Supposed to Punish Ad Blockers, Not Firefox Users (www.404media.co)

submitted 1 year ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/technology@lemmy.world

417 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Firefox users are reporting an 'artificial' load time on YouTube videos. YouTube says it's part of a plan to make people who use adblockers "experience suboptimal viewing, regardless of the browser they are using."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone 637 points 1 year ago (48 children)

"They're the same picture."

Also, that does not explain why:

Chrome users who use an adblocker don't get the issue
Firefox users who do not use an adblocker get the issue
FIrefox users who use an adblocker, but change User Agent to Chrome, don't get the issue

Now, if only we knew who made Chrome and YouTube... The mind boggles.

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Supposedly Firefox users spoofing the Chrome user agent don't get the issue because the script tries to execute the 5s delay in a way that works on Chrome but not on FF. Because the Chrome method doesn't work on FF, it just gets skipped entirely. But I'm not sure if that's entirely accurate, just read about it.

[–] Liquid_Fire@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

But then shouldn't there be a delay when using actual Chrome?

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

There's people reporting exactly that if they're using certain ad-blocking tools.

[–] SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

I did see Chrome users mention a delay (on lemmy) but I haven't personally checked it out

[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My understanding is the method they can use on chrome is near instant, but the alternative they use on Firefox is slower, hence the delay. Is this BS? Yeah probably, but it does at least logically follow.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It could be as simple as for Chrome assuming there is a certain API, while for Firefox, give it a try and assume no if no response in 5sec

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (43 replies)