this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
1742 points (98.1% liked)

Programmer Humor

32375 readers
558 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 189 points 11 months ago (58 children)

ChatGPT is hilariously incompetent... but on a serious note, I still firmly reject tools like copilot outside demos and the like because they drastically reduce code quality for short term acceleration. That's a terrible trade-off in terms of cost.

[–] ToothlessFairy@lemmy.world 123 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I enjoy using copilot, but it is not made to think for you. It's a better autocomplete, but don't ever let it do more than a line at once.

[–] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 63 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yup, AI is a tool, not a complete solution.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

As a software engineer, the number of people I encounter in a given week who either refuse to or are incapable of understanding that distinction baffles and concerns me.

[–] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

That's because it's being advertised as a solution. That's why you have people worried it'll take their jobs when in reality it'll let them do the job better.

[–] takeda@lemmy.world 45 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The problem I have with it is that all the time it saves me I have to use on reading the code. I probably spend more time on that as once in a while the code it produces is broken in a subtle way.

I see some people swearing by it, which is the opposite of my experience. I suspect that if your coding was copying code from stack overflow then it indeed improved your experience as now this process is streamlined.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Same as ChatGPT is better web search.

[–] nogrub@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

id rather search the web than chatgpt because i fact check it anyway

[–] oce@jlai.lu 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don't know if it does yet, but if ChatGPT starts providing source for every information, then it would make it much faster to find the relevant information and check their sources, rather than clicking websites one by one.

[–] tourist@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Yep, ChatGPT4 allows optional calls to Bing now.

It used to have a problem with making a claims that were not relevant to or contradicted its own sources, but I don't recall encountering that problem recently.

load more comments (54 replies)