this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
2009 points (99.1% liked)

me_irl

5239 readers
2 users here now

Selfies for the soul.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ashe@lemmy.starless.one 35 points 1 year ago (8 children)

I could be wrong but I don't think there even is a way to fully prevent adblocking without something like the proposed web integrity API, since it's all clientside and the browser can easily just choose not to render any ads.

Overall I do agree that less people using adblocks means less attention from corps and less adblock-blocks like youtube's, but I'm conflicted on whether that's a good enough reason to have most people suffer through so many ads.

[–] persolb@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Even with web integrity, I don’t see anti-Adblock working. We’re almost at the point that client side AI can screen capture the web page and recreate it sans-ads.

And there are probably simpler solutions to bypass anti-adblock

[–] AbeilleVegane@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I barely know how any of this works, but couldn't Google just decide to not send video content on YouTube until X number of seconds have elapsed, so having ad blockers would block ad content, but not make it faster to see the video?

[–] kugiyasan@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago

They probably could, but I think the risk of directly affecting the normal user experience is too high. That would for example mean that preloading videos will be trickier, and that there is a high chance that there will be a 3 seconds of silence between the ad and the content.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)