this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
260 points (90.1% liked)

Technology

59377 readers
3189 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It is 'nearly unavoidable' that AI will cause a financial crash within a decade, SEC head says::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] I_Has_A_Hat@startrek.website -1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

But AI as it exists right now

That's the fallacy. We aren't talking about AI right now but rather what AI is going to look like 4-5 years from now. Think about how much advancement has happened in just the last year. Last year, ChatGPT was barely a thing, and image generation was little better than vague, blobby shapes that took a lot of computing power to create.

It's absurd to talk about "AI as it exists right now" because within months, "right now" will be horribly outdated.

[–] Naatan@lemdro.id 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

But that's plain fantasy at this point. The current form of AI is fundamentally not intelligent. Advancement of the current form of AI won't change that.

The current form of AI is like the speech center of your brain. On its own it does not constitute a brain, nor will it ever "evolve" to be its own brain.

So the current form of AI may end up forming a small part of the whole, but that whole is as of yet still a fantasy.

[–] slinkyninja@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m not sure you fully appreciate what “advancement” means.

[–] Naatan@lemdro.id 1 points 1 year ago

In this context I’d imagine you meant what the technology could evolve into. But what I’m saying is the technology is fundamentally incapable of being intelligent.

I imagine you think of “the technology” as just artificial intelligence in general. I’m talking about the actual technology in todays “ai”. The inner workings.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)