this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
267 points (93.5% liked)

AssholeDesign

7575 readers
1 users here now

This is a community for designs specifically crafted to make the experience worse for the user. This can be due to greed, apathy, laziness or just downright scumbaggery.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] leinardi@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Interesting. But should this apply to many apps on F-Droid? I also have an app published on both the Play Store and F-Droid and I don't recall having seen requests to change the application ID to avoid clashes between stores.

[–] mundane@feddit.nu 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If the signature matches, Google probably won't care where they are installed from. I suspect that the KDE Connect in fdroid is signed with a different certificate than on google play, causing it to be flagged as an impostor. This could probably be easily prevented by using the same cert or different app identifiers (to cause them to be treated as different apps).

[–] leinardi@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

All F-Droid apks are signed with a different key than the play store one: you do not upload your key when you publish on F-Droid and all the apps are built from source by the F-Droid build servers.

[–] eatham@aussie.zone 1 points 9 months ago

KDE has their own repo I believe.

[–] mundane@feddit.nu 1 points 1 year ago

Ah, so all apps on fdroid should use a different identifier then to avoid collision with the play store build

load more comments (1 replies)