Stop ignoring history Jews were living on that territory for thousands of years, unlike Europeans un America. You are conveniently ignoring facts which would immediately render your analogy completely bogus.

[–] Lurk99777@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And the native Americans weren't? You're the one ignoring history or intentionally misunderstanding the analogy.

[–] kSPvhmTOlwvMd7Y7E@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Case A: population X came to a new land and killed almost all of population Y which lived there before.

Case B: population X came back to their homeland, got attacked by population Y, won the war, didn't not kill population Y, regularly tried to establish truce with population Y which continues to refuse the population X's right to exist.

[–] Lurk99777@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Their homeland? It wasn't their homeland for hundreds of years. The Zionist movement displaced people already living there who had nothing to do with a conflict that occurred hundreds of years prior. They didn't kill the Palestinians outright but they sure as hell did a good job of systematically stripping them of their rights to exist.

Their stated goal from the beginning was to invade and establish a religious state where people were already living similar to what Europeans did when they colonized the Americas.