this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2023
104 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

31 readers
1 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!

founded 2 years ago
 

An update to Google's privacy policy suggests that the entire public internet is fair game for it's AI projects. If Google can read your words, assume they belong to the company now, and expect that they’re nesting somewhere in the bowels of a chatbot.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Books@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago (10 children)

This has been discussed elsewhere, and by people smarter than I, but chat bots are going to start learning from other chat bots and it's going to be less and less reliable over time, no?

Like there is an internet BEFORE ChatGPT, which is about as reliable of data as one could hope to find, and then there is a post day one chatgpt, which the data is already getting polluted by random LLM gibberish. How is google's webscraping going to know if the data it is getting is legitimate human being thoughts, or just random madeup shit from a LLM?

[–] FlashPossum@social.fossware.space 0 points 1 year ago (6 children)

There are experiments with feeding LLMs output of other LLMs and the results are awful. Seems for now they can only generate sensible text if fed human output.

[–] Books@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Right, but if they are training all new AI on shit they find online, like this comment, wouldn't that pollute that dataset, considering I generated this comment with AI?

[–] MoogleMaestro@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can't tell if this is a joke or not lmao

[–] Books@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

It was... perhaps?

[–] nevernevermore@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

considering I generated this comment with AI?

Woah

[–] LostXOR@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your comment seems too intelligent to be AI generated.

[–] Books@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)