this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
317 points (97.9% liked)
Open Source
31865 readers
151 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
- !libre_culture@lemmy.ml
- !libre_software@lemmy.ml
- !libre_hardware@lemmy.ml
- !linux@lemmy.ml
- !technology@lemmy.ml
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I have OSMAnd+, and as a map, it’s great. Data is usually better than GM, and everything is clear. But what it and all other OSM map apps suck at: Searching.
I’d even use a map that send my request to google maps to interpret the search, because currently I’m using Google Maps simply because it’s the only usable one for me.
It’s a bunch of things, focusing the search better on my current location, fixing slight spelling errors, better incremental search, integrated search for both streets and PoI’s. I want to use something OSM based, but I return to google maps every time, simply because I can actually find what I’m looking for :/
I want to like OSM, but like you say, its weakness is search. I have to get the search just right, and make sure I enter the postcode as XXN NXX. And maybe then it might give me the right result.
However, in GM, I can mash the postcode together as XXNXX and it understands. Or if a mall has changed its name and I didn't know, GM gives me what I want, not what I said.