this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
472 points (92.8% liked)

Technology

59446 readers
3633 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Let me introduce you to the concept of sunk cost.

In economics and business decision-making, a sunk cost (also known as retrospective cost) is a cost that has already been incurred and cannot be recovered.

The money already spent cannot be gotten back. Spending more continuing to develop using Unity instead of cutting your losses and moving on is a fools game.

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Many of these groups are small indie companies or single individuals, with limited money. This is more an all in scenario then sunk cost.

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I am not saying it is an easy or pleasant decision.

Many of these groups are small indie companies or single individuals

And they are the people who will be least able to afford this price increase or the next or the next.

It sucks but that is the reality.

Cut your losses and move on.

[–] NoSleep@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A lot of developers have really tight profit margins and/or their current projects heavily rely on what Unity provides. "Cutting their losses and move on" would mean bankruptcy. They might be able to switch to other engines in the future but right now leaving Unity behind is not a valid decision for them.

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I am not saying it is an easy or pleasant decision.

I spent 15 years working in the bankruptcy and insolvency industry. I have seen this sort of situation literally 100s of times.

Staying with Unity will just mean going broke over a longer time frame and after wasting more money.

[–] NoSleep@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And I work as a software developer. You can't just suddenly leave the software behind your business is based on. For a lot of VR or WebGL related Companies there is no alternative to Unity. Also they are not broke right now and most likely won't be next year because of Unitys policy changes. Most devs won't be affected at all. Why just give up your hole business now because there might be problems in the future? Staying with Unity now gives us time to change the business model or find another technology.

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

cool. I am a sysadmin, who has a lot of experience with developers.

Stay with them and good luck.

Pm me when you need a bankruptcy firm recommendation.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)