this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
127 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22270 readers
371 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to !labour@www.hexbear.net.

Take the dunks to /c/strugglesession or !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net.

!chapotraphouse@www.hexbear.net is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SpookyGenderCommunist@hexbear.net 37 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Hey now, some of us do actual Marxist Political Economy. We're not all soulless number wizards, or bootlicking freaks trying to become alphabet boys

[–] EmotionalSupportLancet@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago (9 children)

If I had no idea what polisci people mean by marxist political economy where would I look to find out?

[–] RedDawn@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Political Economy is what people like Adam Smith, David Ricardo, Marx and many others engaged in attempting to explain the way economy works and functions in society. “Economics” as it’s practiced now is kind of a bastardization of it meant to strip moral questions out of the picture and use bs models to say whatever the capitalists want to say. If you want to know I’d say start by reading a summary of the ideas of Smith Ricardo and Marx (something like Marx’s wage labor and capital might be good). I wouldn’t start by trying to read Das Kapital itself. Marxist political economy would be people picking up that tradition and following on from Marx. Lenin’s analysis of Imperialism is adjacent to this.

In terms of modern writers I’m not sure if something like Pickettys Capital in the 21st Century would count, I haven’t read it and not sure if he’s a Marxist. Michael Hudson has good modern analysis as well.

[–] RandomUserName123@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

In terms of modern writers I’m not sure if something like Pickettys Capital in the 21st Century would count, I haven’t read it and not sure if he’s a Marxist. Michael Hudson has good modern analysis as well.

He's not. A critique: https://www.yanisvaroufakis.eu/egalitarianisms-latest-foe-a-critical-review-of-thomas-pikettys-capital-in-the-twenty-first-century/ (And varoufakis' is not what most people would consider a Marxist, and I don't think that 'egalitarianisms' is marxist goal anyway)

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)