"France usually exports more power than it imports, but structural problems with its nuclear fleet, which show no signs of improving, saw exports from the country halve compared to the previous year, while Sweden exported 16 terawatt hours"

Sweden has over 60% of their energy generation from renewables, by the way.

Take a look at this graph:

See that blue line that starts out at the top, then it drops off a cliff? That's coal. Look at it dropping.

The yellow line that's just below it, that's been slowly decreasing until it sharply started dropping? That's nuclear.

Look at my boy wind power, that little gray line, going into orbit, flying like the wind.

Solar PV is that purple line that's trending upwards.

Oil is also slowly decreasing.

So no, you're wrong. Stop digging your heels in and admit when you are wrong.

[–] lntl@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Lol, what am I wrong about? Nuclear is a a carbon free techonolgy that we have that can prodce the energy we need? Germany dumped nuclear to go full renewable and it flopped? France exports a ton energy to Europe? What did I say that was wrong?

I think your brain is full of ideas that came from somewhere else.

[–] Blake@feddit.uk -3 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Watch this, I can make you ragequit this entire argument with this one comment with like a 90% confidence rate:

Prove either of these two statements as false:

The total cost per kWh of nuclear electricity is more expensive than common renewable sources of electricity.
The total amount of carbon dioxide equivalent emissions for nuclear is greater than the carbon dioxide equivalent emissions of common renewable sources of electricity.

Either that or you can loftily declare yourself above this argument, state that I am somehow moving the goalposts, say that "there's no point, I'll never change your mind" or just somehow express some amount of increduiity at my absolutely abhorrent behaviour by asking you such a straightforward question? You may also choose "that's not the question I want to talk about, we should answer MY questions instead!"

But go ahead and prove me wrong, I'll be waiting!

[–] escapesamsara 1 points 1 year ago

The total cost per kWh of nuclear electricity is more expensive than common renewable sources of electricity.

Subsidize nuclear as much as renewables and the price equalizes.

The total amount of carbon dioxide equivalent emissions for nuclear is greater than the carbon dioxide equivalent emissions of common renewable sources of electricity.

This is incorrect, objectively.

load more comments (6 replies)