this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2023
10 points (100.0% liked)

Science

17 readers
7 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on scientific discoveries, research, and theories across various fields, including physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, and more. Whether you are a scientist, a science enthusiast, or simply curious about the world around us, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on a wide range of scientific topics. From the latest breakthroughs to historical discoveries and ongoing research, this category covers a wide range of topics related to science.

founded 2 years ago
 

A cute mathematical trick can "rescale" the Universe so that it isn't actually expanding. But can that "trick" survive all our cosmic tests?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] style99@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If either the particle properties or the fundamental constants were changing, then our laboratory measurements would be changing as well: according to these reformulations, over a ~14 year timescale (since 2009 or so), we would have noticed variations in the observed properties of these well-measured quanta that are thousands of times larger than our tightest constraints: of about 1-part-per-billion.

This argument doesn't sound very convincing with such a lack of precise explanations of the conditions. I'm really not convinced they've thought this through.

[โ€“] _ParallaxMax_@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This struck me too, if you're relying on instruments that exist in a universe where its constants are changing to measure those constants, then it seems very natural to me that your measurements would not necessarily change.
The constants instruments use to measure other constants might change at the same rate, leaving measurement results constant.

Then again, I'm not a physicist, so I'm nowhere near an expert.