I don't see how this would be classed as an advertisement. I have no affiliation with McDonald's and at the end of the day this is a meme that will likely have no effect on their brand image given the strength of their branding already and the relatively miniscule reach of this post. I think it would be a bit overzealous to remove this on the grounds of advertising.

[–] JoeBidet@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not about you as a person, but about this imagery and its (brand) symbolism.

Having any image posted here (even if funny haha, or otherwise), containing logos of Google, Amazon, Apple, Palantir, Coca Cola, etc... would be disturbing to me. I am just wondering if others think this way.

These symbols (brand logos) have been hammered in the brains of each and every inhabitants of this planet, through billions invested in spreading the most low-level messages humans have ever invented ("hmmm!" "i love!" "this is great!" and other brainwashing concepts...). I personally love my spaces to be free from brands, brand names, brand logos, and advertising.

[–] saluki@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I respect that however I am not sure if it is realistic to be able to completely eradicate branding from a platform such as this one, especially in a meme community. I appreciate your point of view and where you're coming from, but the problem that you're describing is occurring at a much higher level in society and I'm not sure that it is something that can be tackled here without upsetting people.

[–] JoeBidet@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago

I thought the whole point of the Fediverse was to give ourselves the chance to define our own standards for interacting as society, through experimenting, and discussing, and finding rough consensus, etc...? ;)

I see your point, but yet I don't give up. Admitting that "the world runs like this" is a self-reinforcing mental block to convince oneself that never will ever change and that there is therefore no point in even trying.

Maybe through discussing these things openly we could raise awareness and build consensus towards onboarding more people with the idea that a corporate brand logo is not just another funny brick to build images with, like the rest, but is something loaded with power, and a history of influence, and often exploitation, etc...? And that one is always serving the interests of this company by re-using their logo in whichever way? (as the cynical PR people say "there is no such thing as bad advertisement"...)

I would somehow react the same if the faces of important historic figures were used trivially, for instance. Even if the purpose is to make people laugh, it is worth reflecting about what images/symbols/powers we propagate...

Sorry for being that party-pooper here :)

load more comments (7 replies)