this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
102 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy Guides

16813 readers
12 users here now

In the digital age, protecting your personal information might seem like an impossible task. We’re here to help.

This is a community for sharing news about privacy, posting information about cool privacy tools and services, and getting advice about your privacy journey.


You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:

Learn more...


Check out our website at privacyguides.org before asking your questions here. We've tried answering the common questions and recommendations there!

Want to get involved? The website is open-source on GitHub, and your help would be appreciated!


This community is the "official" Privacy Guides community on Lemmy, which can be verified here. Other "Privacy Guides" communities on other Lemmy servers are not moderated by this team or associated with the website.


Moderation Rules:

  1. We prefer posting about open-source software whenever possible.
  2. This is not the place for self-promotion if you are not listed on privacyguides.org. If you want to be listed, make a suggestion on our forum first.
  3. No soliciting engagement: Don't ask for upvotes, follows, etc.
  4. Surveys, Fundraising, and Petitions must be pre-approved by the mod team.
  5. Be civil, no violence, hate speech. Assume people here are posting in good faith.
  6. Don't repost topics which have already been covered here.
  7. News posts must be related to privacy and security, and your post title must match the article headline exactly. Do not editorialize titles, you can post your opinions in the post body or a comment.
  8. Memes/images/video posts that could be summarized as text explanations should not be posted. Infographics and conference talks from reputable sources are acceptable.
  9. No help vampires: This is not a tech support subreddit, don't abuse our community's willingness to help. Questions related to privacy, security or privacy/security related software and their configurations are acceptable.
  10. No misinformation: Extraordinary claims must be matched with evidence.
  11. Do not post about VPNs or cryptocurrencies which are not listed on privacyguides.org. See Rule 2 for info on adding new recommendations to the website.
  12. General guides or software lists are not permitted. Original sources and research about specific topics are allowed as long as they are high quality and factual. We are not providing a platform for poorly-vetted, out-of-date or conflicting recommendations.

Additional Resources:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

So as the title mentions, I'm wondering how much is too much?

I am currently using Brave with the setting to:

  • Aggressively block trackers & ads
  • Only connect with HTTPS
  • Block fingerprinting
  • Block cross-site cookies

In addition to that, I have installed the following extensions:

  • uBlock Origin
  • Ghostery
  • Decentraleyes
  • DuckDuckGo Privacy Essentials

So my question is: Is this overkill? If so, what should/could be removed that may be redundant? I want as much coverage as possible, but not have things bloated.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (58 children)

Brave is trash and its owned by an asshole. I use adblock browser in my phone and Firefox otherwise. Not sure about the owner or Dev or whatever, but it's much better quality for blocking ads.

An answer to the more pertinent question of how much is too much, however? None. There's no such thing as too much ad blocking.

[–] Ogygus@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Why is it trash?

And why are Americans obsessed with the politics of who makes a product?

Its a free, as in free beer, browser. By using it you are not donating money to the CEO.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure he donated to (or still donates to?) homophobic action groups.

That's more than enough reason to boycott something that person is in charge of, imo

[–] Ogygus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

How does that affect the software.

[–] priapus@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

When you support software you support the company making it, allowing them to grow and profit. If someone does not want to financially support the actions of someone they disagree with, then that is fine.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I do not want success for that man, therefore I'm not going to give his project market share

[–] Ogygus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Market share.. Of something that can be had free? You are making less and less sense.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)

Yes, because if the browser has no market share, there is no point in it continuing to exist and the company folds.

I don't care if it's free or costs money, the man gets paid if the product is successful. I don't want to support him, therefore I don't use the product. If enough people agree with me and do the same, the product dies & the man fails. Or at the very least the rest of the company kicks him out and the man still fails.

Like this isn't rocket science

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In 2008 he donated $1000 in support of California Proposition 8. I don’t know of anything else, at least publicly. Californians also voted and passed the amendment 52%/47%, it was thrown out by the courts.

More recently in 2020 he did say some of the typical conservative stuff about COVID lockdowns, mask mandates, calling Fouci a liar, etc.

[–] bug@lemmy.one 14 points 1 year ago

Never mind the American politics nonsense, Brave has a history of slightly dodgy behaviour. Replacing websites ads with their own, keeping donations meant for creators, hijacking referral links and adding in their own, a lot of cryptocurrency shenanigans, and that's just what's on Wikipedia!

[–] jayemecee@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I agree with you, that's irrelevant. What's not irrelevant is that it's chromium as in based on chrome, the browser trying to add drm to internet pages. Please use Firefox instead

[–] geosoco@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Given that the US has almost zero privacy legislation, the politics of the owner/maker often hints at decisions that eventually make it into the software. Many of the reasons to avoid chrome and chromium are similar to this, though not about a specific person but about the values that google holds in fucking over standards. We see this reflected in some of the decisions of say social media platforms (even "free-as-in-beer" ones) and many companies.

In many cases, you're still giving them money and/or power to continue fucking up open standards.

[–] Ogygus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What money am I giving. I didn't spend a singular cent.

What power am I giving. I didn't vote for anything.

Who made you like this?

[–] geosoco@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (31 children)
load more comments (31 replies)
load more comments (53 replies)