this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
12 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

19 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
 

Aaron Keller pledged to improve the game for "players who are playing now."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CraigeryTheKid@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (15 children)

the game/steam release definitely deserved bad reviews - but it'd be hard to deny that it wasn't also a bombing run.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (14 children)

A review bomb is when people start jumping down the game's throat with negative reviews for shit unrelated/peripheral to the game. If they're triggered by the actual core design choices of the game it isn't a review bomb.

These reviews are because the game is a money grubbing downgrade from the game people bought and had taken away from them, and this is the first opportunity they had to publish a review on a storefront. The motivation being the actual game means it can't be a review bomb.

[–] ampersandrew@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (11 children)

If they're still playing the game anyway, I might call that a review bomb.

[–] hook@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

No, it's still a review because you're still actively dealing with whatever it is you're complaining about.

"Hey, I really like/liked the core game play loop of this game but I think that it's gotten significantly worse than it was previously. It'd be nice if they changed it back?

4/10."

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)