this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
509 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

62073 readers
5207 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 30 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (16 children)

Home solar indicates a massive management failure of public utilities. If it is more cost effective and more pleasant to generate your own electricity without any economies of scale, something is very wrong.

Source: I live in California where the “public” utility is an absolute disaster that charges $.60-$.70/kW/hr so anybody who can afford the upfront cost of solar has done so.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 18 points 13 hours ago (9 children)

Microgeneration makes way more sense to me. If you generate the power where it is used without pollution, we should. The unfortunate piece is we have to many landlords who's interest are too divorced from their tenets to put up more microgeneration

[–] Barsukis@sopuli.xyz 7 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Makes sense mathematically or you think makes sense?

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago

Both.

The reduction of infrastructure and leveraging existing buildings without reducing their existing utility vs converting a new space to be a dedicated power plant plus the infrastructure to move power from less populus (normal case because the cost of populus land is high due to demand) to more populus space.

I also idealogically support it because it makes more controllable by people and less controlled by an outside entity (a corporation/state).

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)