this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
103 points (85.0% liked)

Progressive Politics

1318 readers
648 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Twenty-nine percent of non-voters who supported Biden in 2020 said U.S. support for the genocide was the top reason they sat the 2024 election, according to a survey by YouGov.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PillowFort@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (9 children)

It's doubtable this poll has uncovered something that countless other post-election polls have missed.

It's more likely that the pollster is biased. This is the first sentence of About section of the pollster's website: "Palestinians, like all people, are entitled to live in freedom and with their human rights respected. Yet, for too long, the US government has funded and enabled Israel’s denial of Palestinian human rights."

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (3 children)

But other polls have found similar results?

[–] PillowFort@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

I dug into the survey and it appears they intentionally skewed the results by the word choice and order of the questions.

For example: "5. Do you [favor or oppose] the Biden administration approving taxpayer-funded weapons and other military support to Israel, even if the U.S. government has no control over whether the Israeli military uses those weapons on innocent civilians in Gaza, or are you undecided?"

The wording in that question will predispose a respondent to view the Biden administration negatively, even if that wasn't the main reason that a respondent chose not to vote.

Worse, they asked that question before they asked about sitting out the election, predisposing the respondent to view that topic as more significant in their decision to sit out the election.

If the purpose of a poll was to figure out the reason for not voting, this is not a scientific way to do it. It predictably would skew results as it appears to have done.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Thanks for digging into it - yeah, that's definitely not a neutral way to phrase things.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Made me look too! Holy shit those are loaded questions.

load more comments (5 replies)