this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
359 points (96.6% liked)

Asklemmy

43892 readers
870 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Just out of curiosity. I have no moral stance on it, if a tool works for you I'm definitely not judging anyone for using it. Do whatever you can to get your work done!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Atramentous@lemm.ee 117 points 1 year ago (18 children)

High school history teacher here. It’s changed how I do assessments. I’ve used it to rewrite all of the multiple choice/short answer assessments that I do. Being able to quickly create different versions of an assessment has helped me limit instances of cheating, but also to quickly create modified versions for students who require that (due to IEPs or whatever).

The cool thing that I’ve been using it for is to create different types of assessments that I simply didn’t have the time or resources to create myself. For instance, I’ll have it generate a writing passage making a historical argument, but I’ll have AI make the argument inaccurate or incorrectly use evidence, etc. The students have to refute, support, or modify the passage.

Due to the risk of inaccuracies and hallucination I always 100% verify any AI generated piece that I use in class. But it’s been a game changer for me in education.

[–] Atramentous@lemm.ee 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I should also add that I fully inform students and administrators that I’m using AI. Whenever I use an assessment that is created with AI I indicate with a little “Created with ChatGPT” tag. As a history teacher I’m a big believer in citing sources :)

[–] limeaide@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How has this been received?

I imagine that pretty soon using ChatGPT is going to be looked down upon like using Wikipedia as a source

[–] Atramentous@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

I would never accept a student’s use of Wikipedia as a source. However, it’s a great place to go initially to get to grips with a topic quickly. Then you can start to dig into different primary and secondary sources.

Chat GPT is the same. I would never use the content it makes without verifying that content first.

[–] vagrantprodigy@lemmy.whynotdrs.org 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is it not already? I've found it to be far less reliable than Wikipedia.

[–] Atramentous@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

This is why I read through everything I use to make sure it’s accurate.

[–] limeaide@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Well the people that use it know that, but for the average person, chatgpt still has a high reputation

load more comments (16 replies)