this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
273 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

60354 readers
6565 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 72 points 1 day ago (16 children)

Honestly, I’m all for tech continuing to move to Texas. Want to make Texas blue? Keep sending tech jobs there.

[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 90 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I hate to wreck this beautiful dream, but tech is not nearly as blue as everyone thinks it is.

I've never spent time around big tech types where the split wasn't 30% libertarians, 30% right-wingers, and 30% american-style liberals.

The problem there is the libertarians land all over the damn spectrum but you end up basically the same place you do everywhere else: it's a 50/50 split.

And let's be honest, the expectation here is that a lot of the employees won't move.

If the goal is to avoid "liberal bias", or whatever, moving the people from California to Texas won't do a damn thing. What you do is you move the jobs somewhere unpalatable, knowing full well this will let you do a mass layoff without it being a layoff, because people "chose" not to move to where their job is.

So we're going to get a couple of jobs, but they're going to be filled by people already here.

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 5 points 13 hours ago

So we're going to get a couple of jobs, but they're going to be filled by ~~people already here.~~ temporary foreign workers

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Texas here. There was an influx of techie movers from blue states during the pandemic. Abbott won. Trump won. Even Rafael Cruz won, and no body likes that guy.

[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yep. Texas has been just-one-more-thing-happening from going blue for 25 years now.

So far, not a single damn one of those things, or even, somehow, the aggregate change of ALL of them has resulted in shit.

Cities are just as blue as they were, and the rest of the state is just as red, and the Republicans have remained in charge throughout it all.

And, before someone goes 'but gerrymandering!', the (R)s are maintaining control even in state-wide elections that are just a matter of getting more votes, too, so while you can argue that some of the stuff is probably gerrymandered, that's not the root cause of it either.

Another handful of people moving here isn't going to make one single bit of difference, and anyone thinking otherwise after literal decades of this kind of wishful thinking needs to take a deep breath and some introspection and figure out why they're still willing to buy that line.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Demographics aren't destiny either. The whole electorate moved red last cycle. It really isn't enough to "these people have stereotypical liberal attributes, they'll flip this state blue!". They won't.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 day ago

On the bright side, Zuck's influence on California politics is going to drastically decrease.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hate to wreck this beautiful dream, but tech is not nearly as blue as everyone thinks it is.

I'm in IT. One of my coworkers has said he's farther right than Limbaugh. He's otherwise a really nice guy. 🤷

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He’s otherwise a really nice guy

Doubt

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not that I know everything about him but if he didn't say that I wouldn't have known. He's even told me a bit of his personal life in which government assistance saved his bacon and corporate America screwed him.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's a little difficult to separate the politics off and put it into a different category altogether. He supports having the government be shitty to people he doesn't like. I have no doubt he could be nice in the pejorative sense -- like in the difference between nice people and kind people or in the "nice guy" meme sense -- but many doubts that he's actually a really nice guy in any sincere way.

It's easier to say you just don't really know him. I think it's similar to the neighbors saying how the serial killer really seemed like a great guy when the reporters interview them. He wasn't a great guy, you just didn't know who he really was.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 3 points 21 hours ago

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7vvxE-gdQ2Q

This bit I feel like is the best explanation of what people mean when they say this.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

I'm gonna go ahead and guess he knows fuck all about rush Limbaugh.

load more comments (11 replies)