this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
-22 points (21.1% liked)

Games

16742 readers
716 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
-22
Change my view: loot boxes aren't as bad as people claim they are. (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Shere_Khan@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/games@sh.itjust.works
25 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Inb4 "sense of accomplishment" I'm not taking about obviously predatory practices here, more of the basic stuff.

So from what I understand, people are against loot boxes, because they are like gambling for children. I argue that gambling isint inheritly bad, and therefore loot boxes aren't either. The vast majority of people are able to go to a Casio and have a fun night. The vast majority of children can go to chuck E cheese and not become degenerates. Yes some people go overboard with it, but that's the same with alhocol, weed, food, etc.

I think a teenager pulling a double shift and spending some money on a virtual slot machine to win a virtual knife skin or some shit is perfectly fine. Yes, some will go overboard, but I think most people are okay.

Change my view

Edit: down voting because you disagree with me is going to lead to the same echo chamber we had on reddit. I'm actually trying to have a discussion on this

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 13 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Your welcome to think that way. It's definitional gambling, some people don't like to enable kids to gamble.

[–] Shere_Khan@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Do those people ban thier kids from arcades? Playing claw machines and stuff? I'm genuinely asking

[–] zeusbottom@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ban from an arcade? No. But claw machines have a near zero chance of getting anything. They are definitely rigged. I used to toss a coin or two into one on the way out of the arcade, never got anything. I would let them experience the disappointment a few times, then suggest that maybe spending that money elsewhere will make them feel better.

[–] Shere_Khan@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, that's how most people react to those things. You knew, even then, that you were unlikely to win. But that's the thrill, beating the odds. I

[–] zeusbottom@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you saying you actually got something out of those? Never once got anything and never did I know anyone who did. The odds of winning were 0 as far as I was concerned. I wasn’t unlikely to win, I was not ever going to win. Lol

[–] maxprime@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Playing games with an element of chance is not the same as gambling.

load more comments (4 replies)