this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2024
360 points (97.9% liked)

Games

16953 readers
347 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
360
Charlie the Unicorn creator: "MultiVersus is a game by Warner Bros, a company with an annual revenue of around 40 billion. Here they are using my work, without permission, to advertise their game." (x.com)
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
16 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dumbass@leminal.space 60 points 1 day ago (9 children)

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 day ago (8 children)

I tend to be in the "fuck corporations" camp, but this doesn't really look like they're stealing his work. It looks nothing like the original Charlie the Unicorn. The original Charlie was gray, while this creature is white and rainbow. This is just a reference.

As an analogy, Borderlands 2 has a sniper rifle names The Storm, and it has the red flavor text "tut tut, looks like rain", which is a quote from Winnie the Pooh. I personally wouldn't call that exploitation. You could try to make an argument, but it's so minor and indirect that any argument wouldn't hold any water

[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 2 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

They mention a character Charlie, unicorns, and a candy place. I don't know why they are being so careful to avoid accusations of stealing the author's work, because that's exactly what they're doing. People who are familiar with Charlie the unicorn are supposed to recognize it here, and spend their money on Warner Bros merchandise. How could you possibly not see this as theft?

[–] bilb@lem.monster 4 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Are pop culture references theft? No.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago

There's more going on.

I’ve seen a number of references to my work in big-company projects before. For example, there’s a dead unicorn with an enchanted kidney named Charlie in World of Warcraft. This is fine! It’s completely within fair-use laws. Using my audio directly is not fair use.

Copyright law, at least in the United States, is heavily weighted towards protecting large corporations. Warner Bros is one of the largest media companies in the world, and it often uses IP law like a weapon against smaller artists. Notable examples include MeatCanyon, whose clear fair use parody video “Wabbit Season” was forcibly removed from YouTube, and Vera Drew, whose parody film “The People's Joker” received a cease and desist letter from WB, initially derailing its film festival premiere schedule.

So WB wasn't just making a reference, but also lifting audio from Steele's work while also shutting down other's fair use parodies.

[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 0 points 7 hours ago

Plagiarism is theft, idiot.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)