Privacy

32465 readers

429 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

I'm starting to believe the "McDonalds" identification might be a slight of hand to protect privacy invasions? (lemmy.world)

submitted 22 hours ago by wowwoweowza@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

43 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I’m timid about this and might be late to a party where others already had this idea, so please, no haters.

I can’t get over how facile and stupid the identification of LM was at a McDoballs. This is someone who fell off the entire grid for three months??

Just asking… but couldn’t an organization trying to conceal its reach and inevitability track a fella… and then… force an identification?

I do not have any idea about details… it’s broad strokes. Could it be? How many other privacy lovers heard about these three months completely off the grid somehow and also wondered… how?

Please pardon if this isn’t the appropriate place but the real theme is privacy. What if the watchers are always watching even when a person might believe they have made themself completely digitally invisible?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Buffalobuffalo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

And that the police took the report seriously, to dedicate enough resources and shoot no one. They suspected he'd have a weapon, and no bullets flew from a group known for weak trigger discipline.

How many shitty fake reports from the poor sighted and easily convinced did they need to sift through to jump up for this one.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 9 points 19 hours ago

Hell, I remember during Trump's term they basically waxed a protestor as he was going to work. My guess is McDonald's didn't want the bad press of a shooting on their property.

load more comments (1 replies)