this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
631 points (94.4% liked)

Comic Strips

12636 readers
4287 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

Well, the problem with this line of thinking is that we do have empirical evidence that depressed people DO get better by making a huge effort to get better.

Drag had anecdotal evidence, which is incredibly weak evidence.

Drag may have had baseless belief in something and it worked out, but my point is, the evidence WAS available to support that point.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 2 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Yes, it was, but evidence doesn't work on most people with severe depression. The disease impairs the part of your brain that processes good news. Drag understood the evidence, but drag's dragon couldn't, because it was sick. That's what depression is.

[–] AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Drag doesn't have to explain depression to me.

If Drag understood the evidence, then it sounds like the conclusion Drag should come to is not to baselessly believe in things without evidence, but rather to make a better use of context to rid dragself of blindness caused by anecdotal evidence.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 hours ago

Is that your advice to depressed people who think life is hopeless? To use context better?