this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024
119 points (85.6% liked)

Linuxsucks

209 readers
89 users here now

Rules:

  1. FOSS advocates and Linux evangelists aren't welcome. -We ask that you block us.
  2. Moderation is heavy handed. Try to stay on topic (that is LINUXSUCKS!).
  3. No Complaining Mute the sub if users, content, or rules bother you *it's ok to report rule violations

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Bonus question: With or without - ?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rtxn@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (9 children)

"The world should conform to my expectations, not long-standing conventions!"

But if you engage your thinking meat, you might just discover the magic of alias untar='tar xvf'.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

"long-standing conventions" is how you end up with Internet Explorer still pre-installed on Windows Server 2025.
And when was the last time you used the tar "tape archiver" to archive things on tape?

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Magnetic tapes are still being used as long-term storage, as backups for example. They are inexpensive, compact, have zero moving parts, and are more durable than optical media. All you have to do is keep them in a location that is around room temperature, relatively dry, and away from magnets.

But that's not really what tar does. It simply collects the input files and writes them to a single contiguous data stream -- a file not unlike an actual tape. It's worked like that for, I shit you not, 45 years, and it is very much a single project holding up modern technology situation. I fear to imagine what would happen if it were to change.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What the fuck zero moving parts? Are you high?

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

That would be the sticky tape. Also good for long term storage.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)