this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
43 points (100.0% liked)

memes

22750 readers
494 users here now

dank memes

Rules:

  1. All posts must be memes and follow a general meme setup.

  2. No unedited webcomics.

  3. Someone saying something funny or cringe on twitter/tumblr/reddit/etc. is not a meme. Post that stuff in !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net, it's a great comm.

  4. Va*sh posting is haram and will be removed.

  5. Follow the code of conduct.

  6. Tag OC at the end of your title and we'll probably pin it for a while if we see it.

  7. Recent reposts might be removed.

  8. Tagging OC with the hexbear watermark is praxis.

  9. No anti-natalism memes. See: Eco-fascism Primer

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

the historical reference in question:

I love how westerners need to keep rediscovering the "simpler equipment that you can actually make a bunch of beats the amazing wunderwaffe" idea over and over again, you'd think WW2, you know, literally the largest war ever fought, would teach some lessons, but I guess not

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Frank@hexbear.net 18 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Lulz.

Yeah Neoliberal and NATO war strategy is hyper-focused on their fancy toys.

I keep trying to explain to people that hte T-72 is less armored than the Abrams bc the T-72 designers put "can this cross bridges so it can actually get to a battle" as the top of their weight allowance.

What? How would it withstand rocks thrown by terrorists when invading a 3rd world country then?