this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
606 points (99.3% liked)

Apple

17438 readers
64 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (16 children)

I think the battery system that's best for everyone would be user-replaceable batteries. That way you can have an extra battery on hand to swap in as needed, or even extra-capacity batteries that make your phone a little thicker for people who are okay with that.

Those of us who do actually prefer thinner, lighter phones can still have them (maybe with a slight increase in thickness to accommodate the attachment mechanisms). Plus bigger batteries are a huge waste of resources if the capacity isn't going to be used.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (10 children)

that was a thing in the early days. most clamshells had em and a few flat panels (called candybars)

[–] copd@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

In fairness the removable battery came with a pretty significant tradeoff.

Water resistance.

Many would happily take a reduction in water resistance for replaceable batteries, the problem is no one gives us the choice

EDIT: inaccurate statement. Fairphone offers removable batteries

[–] sekki@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There are phones that give you this choice. The Fairphones for example. The back cover is easily removable and you can pop out the battery like in the ol' days. It has an IP55 as far as I know.

[–] copd@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

That sounds sweet, I'll consider Fairphone once my current android dies its not so noble death

[–] CrashOverride@moth.social -2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

@sekki @copd if my device only cost around $500, that IP rating would be fine, but when you’re paying three times that, you want it to be fully waterproof, sorry, resistant.

[–] bluewing@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

For the kind of money flagship phones go for these days, I want that bastid waterproof down to 300 meters AND last a week.

[–] sekki@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't know what a Fairphone costs where you live but where I live the Fairphone 5 starts at 550€ and the model with more storage and memory is 629€. That is no where even in the near of three times the price.

[–] CrashOverride@moth.social 1 points 1 week ago

@sekki I didn’t say it was. I said at that price, a lower IP rating wouldn’t bother me. My device cost $1,600 so it better have the best IP rating available.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)