Technology

34904 readers

306 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.

Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.

Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

MinutePhrase@lemmy.ml

165

Amazon AWS CEO: Quit if you don't want to return to office (www.reuters.com)

submitted 1 month ago by geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml

42 comments fedilink hide all child comments

One of Amazon's (AMZN.O) top executives defended the new, controversial 5-day-per-week in-office policy on Thursday, saying those who do not support it can leave for another company.

Speaking at an all-hands meeting for AWS, unit CEO Matt Garman said nine out of 10 workers he has spoken with support the new policy, which takes effect in January, according to a transcript reviewed by Reuters.

Those who do not wish to work for Amazon in-office five days per week can quit, he suggested.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 75 points 1 month ago (17 children)

Let them enforce it. Don't quit, that's what they are trying to accomplish anyway.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago (13 children)

How would that work? People are just going to stay home in front of a disconnected PC and somehow not get fired?

[–] bork@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why would the PC be disconnected?

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

If the company doesn't want you to work from home they're not going to let you connect to their system.

[–] themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 month ago

That's constructive dismissal

[–] bork@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They want people in the office, but they still want people to be able to work when they're at home too. No shot RTO comes with blocking remote access to corp systems, or even prod for that matter.

How would oncalls be handled without it even?

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm guessing by going into the office haha.
Fuck'em.

[–] bork@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oncall is usually a 24/7 type of thing, where speed is a major factor, and I doubt they would want to restrict oncall engineers to on-site only.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I'm not seeing anything about 24/7 on call workers. The article is about five days a week employees. Did I miss something?

[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Bork is saying a blanket ban on computers connecting remotely would not work in a company that has a huge operations department who need to be on-call.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ok, I understand that. But I didn't say anything about either of those things.

[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You kind of did?

Unless I'm misinterpreting your comment.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

I don't know what comment exactly you're referring to. So probably yes.
Nothing I've said has been complicated or profound.

[–] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Usually it's phased and they don't cut off remote access entirely. They still want you to be able to work on the weekend at home...

load more comments (11 replies)

load more comments (14 replies)