PC Gaming

8563 readers

895 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

Be Respectful.
No Spam or Porn.
No Advertising.
No Memes.
No Tech Support.
No questions about buying/building computers.
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

EXiLExJD@lemmy.ca

UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca

KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com

315

Steam now tells gamers up front that they're buying a license, not a game (www.engadget.com)

submitted 1 month ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca

68 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 month ago (4 children)

corporations would make breathing a subscription service if they could

[–] ihatetheworld@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 month ago (3 children)

When you are six hours into playing Battlefield and you run out of ammo in your clip, and we ask you for a dollar to reload, you're really not very price sensitive at that point in time. A consumer gets engaged in a property, they might spend 10,20,30,50 hours on the game and then when they're deep into the game they're well invested in it. We're not gouging, but we're charging and at that point in time the commitment can be pretty high. But it is a great model and I think it represents a substantially better future for the industry.

I was reminded of this. They would if they could. I am glad i am not living in that timeline.

[–] dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I am glad i am not living in that timeline.

Yet

load more comments (2 replies)