this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
29 points (100.0% liked)

Nim Programming Language

214 readers
7 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] ICastFist@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm curious to the reasoning behind moving a bunch of standard library stuff to external packages, listed at the end of the blog post. Faster compiling? Smaller executables? Faster development for each now separate package?

[โ€“] grayrest@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

I don't know the specific motivation here but in general it's for package development to not be tied to the language release. People also generally have different backwards compatibility expectations for the stdlib vs a regular library and that constrains the development of the package. In Python the meme is that stdlib is where packages go to die. Not all large stdlib languages feel that way. Clojure, for example, has a pretty sizeable stdlib while being code frozen without a lot of demand for change. In general, however, language developers prefer not having things in stdlib.

load more comments (1 replies)