this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
1248 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

59402 readers
4063 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

TL;DR

  • Efforts like Graphene OS face increasing pressure from apps that refuse to run on non-standard Android.
  • The custom ROM project characterizes Google’s approach to device attestation as incomplete and flawed.
  • Graphene OS is prepared to take legal action if Google won’t let it pass Play Integrity checks.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] towerful@programming.dev 35 points 3 months ago (34 children)

The only reason I stopped using grapheneOS was because Google contactless payment didn't work.
Loved everything else about graphene tho

[–] tabular@lemmy.world -3 points 3 months ago (22 children)

I've never used contactless on my phone, I already had a contactless debit card. Why are you, and others, using their phones to pay?

[–] nevemsenki@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I can create a virtual card before every trip, use it via my phone and then cancel it after the trip, never worrying if my card got skimmed anywhere for one.

[–] steel_nomad@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

For some fucking reason there is zero option for this type of secure virtual card in my country. And I hate it. A friend got skimmed for over $1200 a couple months ago.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (31 replies)