[-] soycapitan451@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Sigh. It's obvious what Trump was doing here.

He making a play to regain the childless cat lady vote.

[-] soycapitan451@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Why Landlords never seem to take into account that rises in property/land value also equal profit has always been a mystery to me.

[-] soycapitan451@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

It's fine, she said in an interview afterwards that her next career move is fulfilling a lifetime ambition of joining the circus. So the spot is still open.

[-] soycapitan451@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

He had been incorrectly identified as a terrorist and an imminent threat. The fuck up was not the person who fired the gun but whoever gave him the order.

[-] soycapitan451@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Another Brit here, yes cops do get punished in high profile cases with video evidence such as this.

The contradictory examples listed above were quite complex cases from what I remember.

That said, as a teenager a friend of mine was beaten up in a police van in a case of mistaken identity. He was advised by his lawyer to drop the case as there was little chance of proving what happened as the police had smashed up his phone which he had been recording them with.

Due to the context of police officers being injured prior to what's shown on tape. I expect in this instance, the cop to get a lenient pushiment.

[-] soycapitan451@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago

I might get downvoted to oblivion, but I'm open to discussion.

Firstly, having read the full article... IF (big if) she's telling the truth and it wasn't even her then its hard not to feel sympathy for her.

Secondly (more controversially), is a picture of a noose racist? I mean, it certainly has racist connotations and I personally wouldn't have used it, but (bear with me) I'm not sure racist is the concrete conclusion. Lots of people have been hung throughout history, if you're not viewing it through a racial lens then are you a racist or just very insensitive.

What about if it was a picture of a mastiff? Or a police officer? Both these things could symbolise the subjugation of slaves. Are we really gonna ban pictures of dogs or police?

Symbols mean different things to different people. Sometimes people just need to be told they've been insensitive and given the chance to apologise with promise of doing better in the future.

There is a scenario where whoever put that up was not invoking the lynchings of black people specifically.

Just my 2c.

[-] soycapitan451@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

It's from an episode of Pingu. I only know this because it terrified me as a child and still haunts my nightmares as I approach my 40s.

[-] soycapitan451@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Organising nones is like herding cats. The evangelicals do not get their power from their number. They vote uniformly and reliably, turning out for every primary, local, and federal election.

We are a diverse bunch with diverse opinions.

[-] soycapitan451@lemmy.world 28 points 11 months ago

As a local, I really don't mind that this is the most famous Manchester picture from the last 4/5 years- genuinely a work of art.

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/535/cpsprodpb/181AF/production/_87453789_1capture.jpg

[-] soycapitan451@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Being able to pay for for therapy, or being financially secure to admit to yourself that you have a problem is a privilage.

Source: would like to do therapy but life/raising 3 kids is in the way.

[-] soycapitan451@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Part of me wonders what a Greta Gerwig - Oppenhiemer and/or Christipher Nolan's - Barbie would look like.

[-] soycapitan451@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I really like this update. Thanks for making the transition over to Lemmy such a positive experience.

view more: next ›

soycapitan451

joined 1 year ago