[-] rainerloeten@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Interesting to hear! For me, it's usually exploring an idea, that I find interesting, in detail. Usually something that could perhaps happen in the future (i.e. science fiction).

So I would say that Westworld is one of my favorite shows. Severance is also very interesting!

PS: I think you'd like Brooklyn 99.

[-] rainerloeten@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Idk. I agree that it's a bad practice, but I also don't understand the downvotes. I think in this context it's valid to share your preference whether to update or not. Maybe some people just click dislike because it has lots of dislikes? Who knows :)

[-] rainerloeten@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago

Once a detector is good, you can train a model to adjust its outputs to cause false negatives from the detector. Then the cycle repeats. It's a cat and mouse game basically.

The only proper way I see is a system that is based ob cryptographic signatures. This ia easier said than done ofc.

[-] rainerloeten@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago

Not sure of you're trolling or not...

[-] rainerloeten@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago

I agree. Especially as the app is already 20 MB in size... 1.5MB wouldn't make much difference IMO.

105
Ich👅iel (lemmy.world)
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by rainerloeten@lemmy.world to c/ich_iel@feddit.de

Laminierter DIN A4 Zettel am Pfandautomaten eines Rewe Markts, auf dem steht: "Sehr geehrte Kundinnen und Kunden, AUS HYGIENISCHEN GRÜNDEN BITTEN WIR SIE DEM PFANDBON NICHT IN DEN MUND ZU NEHMEN. Wir danken für Ihr Verständnis."

[-] rainerloeten@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago

It was so crowded actually, that most people didn't even realize the protest was canceled.

Also the cell network (both internet and SMS/calls) was completely down, so meeting up or getting information was nearly impossible

[-] rainerloeten@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

This shouldn't be "offered" IMHO, this should be mandatory. Yes, people are very ignorant about cyber security (I've studied in this field, trust me, I know). But the answer isn't to put the responsibility on the user! It is to design products and services which are secure by design.

If someone is actually able to crack accounts via brute-forcing common passwords, you did not design a secure service/product.

[Edit: spelling]

[-] rainerloeten@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I think he was being sarcastic, playing with words. Meaning, that you trade in time, runtime and memory and get nothing in return :D so a pretty bad trade haha.

Of course it's worse, I mean, that was the point of this blogpost, wasn't it? :p It's just a (long) joke.

[-] rainerloeten@lemmy.world 57 points 9 months ago

Someone should make a post about why blocking Threads is good and why it's not to be confused with gate keeping. If not properly communicated, this could look very badly for the uninitiated and they're not to blame.

Some people of course have an educated opinion against blocking, but many presumably don't know the reasons behind it.

[-] rainerloeten@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Yeah just fucking sad. This guy changed the way I think about software, releasing code I write, contributing etc. Would be so sad to see him go.

[-] rainerloeten@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

I just wanna add that one reason this monopoly is dangerous is that Google (could and nowadays) does use it to dictate "web standards". So e.g. they don't come anymore from organizations that develop standards but Google just forces their own standards by sheer power of market dominance.

view more: next ›

rainerloeten

joined 1 year ago