This stuff feels like a DJ is cross-fading between the different hype cycles.
A lemmy-specific coiner today: https://awful.systems/post/2417754
The dilema of charging the users and a solution by integrating blockchain to fediverse
First, there will be a blockchain. There will be these cryptocurrencies:
This guy is speaking like he is in Genesis 1
I guess it would be better that only the instances can own instance-specific coins.
You guess alright? You mean that you have no idea what you're saying.
if a user on lemmy.ee want to post on lemmy.world, then lemmy.ee have to pay 10 lemmy.world coin to lemmy.world
What will this solve? If 2 people respond to each other's comments, the instance with the most valuable coin will win. What does that have to do with who caused the interaction?
From the second reddit post
But when I say that being told that everything I’d set up didn’t count, that broke me. I had worked so hard, literally from the fucking hospital, to be told that it didn’t count. That the thing that I had set up as an accommodation for disabled or immunocompromised didn’t count
The current Executive Director is the board member that works under a pen name and an AI picture. ... had signed tax documents under said pen name.
Moderator Y starts parroting on the forums that they have it on "good authority" that Letitia (who is Black) is a diversity hire
All very ironic
The paper is so bad...
the agent's policy π ... the environment ε
What is up with AI papers using fancy symbols to notate abstract concepts when there isn't a single other instance of the concept to be referred to
They offer a bunch of tables with numbers in a metric that isn't explained, showing that they are exactly the same for "random" and "agent" policy, in other words, inputs don't actually matter! And they say they want to use these metrics for training future versions. Good luck.
For the sample size they are using 60% seems like a statistically significant rate, and they only tested at most 3 seconds after real gameplay footage.
Sidenote: Auto-regressive models for much shorter periods are really useful for when audio is cutting out. Those use really simple math, they aren't burning any rainforests
I'm willing to retract my statement that these guys don't have any ulterior motives.
The tone of the article was unusual, putting way too large of a quote from the researchers and taking them at their word. Maybe it's sarcasm i'm not getting, but either way, the "research" is just a bit of fun if the only goal was getting Doom to run
“Sufficiently polite nazis–which you cannot tell apart from normal users–will help a community, but uncivil people–even if good!– will harm it.”
What a succinct way to put it! Bravo! It even surpasses the fucking equivocation with "israel bombing palestinian hospitals" and "the trans agenda"
LessWrong doesn't let you download if your user agent isn't a browser. Did y'all know about this?
$ curl https://www.lesswrong.com
<html>
<head><title>403 Forbidden</title></head>
$ curl https://www.lesswrong.com -A "Mozilla"
<!doctype html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
I remember I used to watch this guy's videos, and the icon for the image viewer in serenity was pepe the frog. And he also admitted to browsing 4chan. And he changed his twitter link to x.com before even twitter changed it. Also it was kinda weird that he had some private discord channels whose contents he was very secretive of. Now that he's making a nonprofit with github's former CEO, there is absolutely zero barriers to the exact same bullshit from all the companies he complains about.
Also that person created their account 14 hours ago and has been posting continuously, like where do they find the time to do stuff like this? EDIT: It's also hilarious that they responded to someone actually being demeaned for their appearance like half an hour before coming here. That totally makes you the good guy standing up for these injustices.
Most of the reports are unfounded in these apps. The EFF wrote about them: https://sls.eff.org/technologies/community-surveillance-apps
Lol at this unimaginably boring fragment of a fiction story inside of a child protection report
Whut. Why would you lie like this?