[-] bramkaandorp@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Yup! People will have no job because of this. The least they can do is be honest and unambiguous.

[-] bramkaandorp@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Does that translate to a 50/50 chance of gods existing?

[-] bramkaandorp@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

It tends to lead to hyperactive minds...

Citation need, I think.

[-] bramkaandorp@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

A mention is not the same as an appearance, so the discrepancy for some characters could be even greater if you take that into account.

[-] bramkaandorp@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

There is no precedence for the existence of deities.

For belief in deities, yes, but not for their existence.

That is all we need to say if we believe in the existence of deities; prior plausibility.

Staying in the middle ground of "maybe, we don't know" makes no sense, because it puts the plausibility one step further towards "yes" than is warranted based on the evidence we have.

[-] bramkaandorp@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Pre-Madonna, I think.

[-] bramkaandorp@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Looks like it's two separate projects.

[-] bramkaandorp@lemmy.world 39 points 4 months ago

"The Parker's".

That is the worse crime.

[-] bramkaandorp@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Look to Windward by Iain M. Banks. Space opera at its best.

[-] bramkaandorp@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Intellectual property owners.

[-] bramkaandorp@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

So do I, but I can see why someone would be put off the whole series after reading The Colour of Magic, so having some other books to recommend makes sense to me.

[-] bramkaandorp@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Scumbags. Let them pay the wages of sin.

And no, not literally. We've progressed from biblical morality.

19

I love Kim Stanley Robinson’s books, and am reading (in some case re-reading) his books in order. At some point, I’m going to get to Green Earth, but since it’s a reworking of the Science in the Capitol trilogy, I wanted to find out just how much it adds/leaves out/changes.

Is the difference significant enough to merit a “re-read”? I'm particularly interested in characterization, but I'm also curious if the science itself has been significantly changed, with resulting plot changes.

Thanks!

view more: next ›

bramkaandorp

joined 1 year ago