[-] Vampire@hexbear.net 3 points 11 minutes ago

Thanks for being comradely

[-] Vampire@hexbear.net 6 points 1 hour ago

"We want it to bloom"

[-] Vampire@hexbear.net 6 points 2 hours ago

I've seen hate for them on Hexbear, I don't know enough to have an opinion.

55

If ONE of you fuckers tells me to touch grass I'm gonna thump you

[-] Vampire@hexbear.net 9 points 2 days ago

It is an interesting feeling seeing such sophisticated engineering used for this.

The combination of highly developed human brains and such disgustingly underdeveloped human hearts.

There is something undeniably sophisticated in the mechanics of the attack.

Same as when I hear about the CIA 'heart attack gun'. If you don't know, the CIA developed a gun that shot a bullet made not of metal but frozen shellfish toxin that would pierce the skin, melt, and cause a heart attack. A coroner won't test for rare shellfish toxin and may/may not notice a pinprick wound. So it's a gun and you point it at someone and they have a heart attack. There's got to be a part of your mind that admires the ingenuity – and that ingenuity is turned to such malevolent purposes.

[-] Vampire@hexbear.net 9 points 3 days ago

Nice try FBI

[-] Vampire@hexbear.net 4 points 3 days ago

Total pinko shit.

[-] Vampire@hexbear.net 5 points 3 days ago

Nope. Let's not do this.

88
submitted 3 days ago by Vampire@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net
[-] Vampire@hexbear.net 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Note that I said "non-conformist and anti-authoritarian", which is very different from "class conscious". Joe Rogan is a Bernie Sanders supporter. You wouldn't meet many authrights who like psychedelics.

The research says that the change is to do with 'Openness': https://www.livescience.com/16287-mushrooms-alter-personality-long-term.html

[-] Vampire@hexbear.net 7 points 3 days ago

I guess that begs the question of why non-addictive psychedelics are taboo, and I suspect that one doesn't have a very good materialist explanation.

Could it be that they lead to non-conformist and anti-authoritarian patterns of thinking?

47

Capitalism has a deep-seated taboo against taking recreational drugs. So strong is the taboo they will ruin your life and exile you from mainstream society for doing something recreational.

This is changing a bit as the scientists tell them there is basically no reason for this. But the scientists meet with resistance from entrenched cops, judges, lawyers, who are very frothingfash about it.

What's the materialist explanation for this moralistic taboo?

[-] Vampire@hexbear.net 16 points 4 days ago

What is this ?

[-] Vampire@hexbear.net 13 points 5 days ago

There's also ghostarchive, which they cannot block

79
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by Vampire@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

The left's main vulnerability is splitting and infighting. We are terrible at it. This is known.

To build revolutionary change, a revolutionary party is needed. It must do its work and carry on its work. In the military, they taught me that the number one priority is preserving your ability to fight. It's ok if you have setbacks, lose equipment or men or tactical position or advantage; but it's a catastrophe if you lose the capacity to fight.

Leftist infighting is what robs the movement of its ability to fight on. It kills the movements. (The Buddhists know this, and consider 'creating a schism in the sangha' the supreme sin. That's a tangent, but the Buddhists have maintained an ideological movement for 26 centuries so they're doing something right.)

We need to mock people who shame other leftists for impurity, who insult them for making mistakes. Liu Shaoqi said: "The attitude of some Party members towards these shortcomings and mistakes and towards those comrades who have incorrect ideas is one of “bitter hatred and gall”. They lightly sever all relations with comrades who have committed some mistake and whom they attempt to expel from the Party outright."

It is ok for comrades to make mistakes in action, and to have mistaken beliefs. That's the completely normal, inevitable part of having a movement. In fact, that's all a movement is: listening to people's beliefs, listening to their wrong beliefs, correcting them, unifying the thought of the party, unity makes strength. It is not ok to have incorrect ideas of “bitter hatred and gall”, and lightly sever all relations with comrades who have committed some mistake.

MAO MADE 30% MISTAKES, INCLUDING CAUSING THE BIGGEST FAMINE IN HUMAN HISTORY!!! If you can forgive that, you can forgive someone who made an off-colour tweet when they were a teenager.

People who try to cancel comrades for stuff they did/said in the distant past, or for non-core differences of opinion, are dong the imperialists work for them: dismantling the socialist movement.

PS: the aim is always to have a cohesive, united, strong movement with the correct views. Anything that serves the aim is good. Anything that wrecks the aim is bad.

36
124
submitted 1 week ago by Vampire@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net
126
submitted 1 week ago by Vampire@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net
34
submitted 1 week ago by Vampire@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net
16
submitted 1 week ago by Vampire@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net
10
31
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Vampire@hexbear.net to c/askchapo@hexbear.net

The bourgeoisie are trying to block instances.

What instances are working for you?

64
submitted 2 weeks ago by Vampire@hexbear.net to c/politics@hexbear.net
view more: next ›

Vampire

joined 3 years ago
MODERATOR OF