this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
828 points (96.2% liked)

World News

32531 readers
440 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It uncovered eight WHO panelists involved with assessing safe levels of aspartame consumption who are beverage industry consultants who currently or previously worked with the alleged Coke front group, International Life Sciences Institute (Ilsi).

Their involvement in developing intake guidelines represents “an obvious conflict of interest”, said Gary Ruskin, US Right-To-Know’s executive director. “Because of this conflict of interest, [the daily intake] conclusions about aspartame are not credible, and the public should not rely on them,” he added.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] M68040@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Would this fall under the purvey of regulatory capture?

[–] Apollo@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Regulatory bodies tend to act purely as pipelines getting people jobs in the industry they are supposed to be regulating.

Profits before people, as always.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›