Oh, is that why none of them are black?
Or even average looking.
In using Stable Diffusion for a DnD related project, I've found that it's actually weirdly hard to get it to generate people (of either sex) that aren't attractive - I wonder if it's a bias in the training materials, or a deliberate bias introduced into the models because most people want attractive people in their AI pics
It's trained on professionally taken photos. Professional photographers tend to prefer taking photos of attractive subjects.
Yeah all of my professional photographers hate me.
That's true, but it's not like ugly people don't get photographed - ultimately a professional photographer is going to take photos of whoever pays them to do so. That explanation accounts for part of the bias I think, but not all of it
If I would get pictures taken by a photographer I would not allow them to be used as training data. I don't even like looking into a mirror. Maybe that's part of why there are less ugly people pictures to train with.
They were created via a prompt, that prompt probably included some tags to make them more attractive. It's often standard practice to put tags like "ugly" and "deformed" into the negative prompts just to keep the hands and facial features from going wonky.
There are no elderly women, no female toddlers, and so forth either. Presumably just not what whoever generated this was going for. You can get those from many AI models if you want them.
Battleship coordinates, (B10). Also (I4) looks a lot like my niece. I really think it depends on your definition of "average" though. But as @fubo indicated. There are 0% black people in this photo. There's some vaguely Asian, roughly Middle Eastern looking, sort of South American, and whatever that is going on in (M8). But there are distinctly zero black people pictured.
"Not just these women, but all pictures of all women everywhere. Women are a myth!"
Just like birds.
That's a lot of white chicks.
Really it's like 6, copy pasted over and over
Yeah, a lot of the faces look very very similar!
The astronaut one is funny
casually takes off pressurized helmet on the moon
Where is it? I looked everywhere, couldn't find it.
6th row from the bottom towards the middle, left of the cop
They mostly all look like that one girl from that show, whatever it was.
My god, soon they will be making them nsfw!
They what!? Oh my
Even the genitals are amazingly accurate (nsfw) - https://imgur.io/gallery/H5nPH
Wow, you sure that's AI? That's really impressive!
wow cant even tell the difference.
Impressive and a bit horrifying. Still, it seems to have a big problem recreating hands. A dating profile with a set of profile pics that doesn't feature a hand will now become suspect... until it cracks hands, too.
Plenty of models can do hands just fine
This AI has a type
That is some how cool and creepy all at once. I guess it gives a macro-view of what we consider attractive.
Not really. OP doesn't mention how they were generated, and how the pictures were selected.
It could just reflect the kinds of photos that went into the image generator, and the biases that were in its training data, unless the photos were chosen based on an attractiveness survey or some such.
It gives a view of what whoever generated these images considers attractive.
A16, C7, still not quite there with hands. 😬
There's a ton of fucked up hands in there. It also seems to struggle with handbags. It's kinda fun to try to find one that isn't flawed in some way, I haven't found one that isn't.
The hands are the giveaway in an otherwise convincing image almost every time.
Finally, some positive representation in media for people with diverse bodies / disability! /s
There are repeats too
real females remixed
The cop probably has pointy elbows.
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
