20
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] NuPNuA@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

So an adult man possibly spent his legally earned wages buying legal homemade porn from another consenting adult man. How is this an outrage, Hew can do what he wants with his own money.

[-] palordrolap@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

It's not clear from the news articles whether any pictures were even sent, let alone paid for.

The police determining there's no crime doesn't tell us that either.

For all we know, the whole thing is a dead cat to distract from other, more serious (or genuine) scandals that might be going on. Or to keep them out of the news cycle altogether.

Even if the allegations are true, and he's paid a ridiculous sum for some illicit filth, he really only has to explain his behaviour to his wife and family.

[-] luffyuk@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

It's a dead cat.

On the same day this news dropped, Boris Johnson failed to turn his phone in to the police.

[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

I was with you untill that last paragraph. If he solicited explicit photos from a minor, he has a lot more explaining to do than just to his wife and family.

[-] peter@feddit.uk 6 points 1 year ago

The sun is now saying that they never claimed that he requested photos whilst he was a minor

[-] palordrolap@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

I was working on the assumption that if he solicited photos from a minor, that would have been a crime. Since no crime was found, ... etc.

[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Okay, that meaning didn't get across because illicit means illegal.

[-] dudebro@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

I just think it's funny.

this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
20 points (79.4% liked)

World News

32114 readers
745 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS