this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
123 points (97.7% liked)

News

25357 readers
5548 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 1 points 1 minute ago

This is an excuse and nothing more to consolidate power, remove oversight, and sabotage the American intelligence apparatus on behalf of Russia.

[–] DougHolland@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Sounds like they specifically targeted the gay and trans groups, which is infuriating but can't possibly be surprising. They'll be coming for any group that had their own chat rooms -- minorities, Muslims, whatever.

This is America now.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 5 points 3 hours ago

So, a lot of experts are going to be trying to find the Trump pee tapes?

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 47 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

Does anyone else not talk about that stuff on work accounts? They’re just used for work and I assume my boss and his boss and their bosses will all read everything.

[–] FoxyFerengi@lemm.ee 45 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

I don't think I'd be comfortable talking about stuff on a work chat, but this sounds like it was specifically a support group chat for lgbtq+ employees. The entire point of that would be to discuss that aspect of themselves.

Edit: https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/the-new-mccarthyism-lgbtq-purges

[–] its_prolly_fine@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago

But it was a group chat for work. In anything even a little bit security driven it's only for work related activities, just like email. I can't imagine talking about anything related to sex or medical operations on teams.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 13 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

That makes a bit more sense but I still wouldn’t trust it. We can get together outside of work.

[–] boydster@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I think for younger people, this is probably feeling like a betrayal. Almost like, "The boss said smoking was OK as long as we stayed in the smoking area and didn't litter our butts everywhere, but then they just up and fired everyone that took smoke breaks the other day."

"Don't smoke at work" is an easy thing to say, and most people adhere to that in general. But it's still fucked up to fire the smokers, when company policy just literal days before was "it's fine, just follow these basic rules."

Older people grew up keeping their private life private a lot more than younger people today, who have grown up online having their data mined constantly. Just by the nature of having grown up without ubiquitous data harvesting devices feeding analytics companies, we had more privacy as a default condition.

These particular folks were told they had a safe space for the chats they had, and then the rug was pulled from under them.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

I've never worked with someone that effectively reads anything other than the title or maybe the first sentance, but I would also not use work software or accounts for anything I wouldn't want printed on 20ft billboards with my name attached. That's about the least secure place to do anything.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 5 points 6 hours ago

You would think that intelligence officers would know that.

(Note that this doesn't mean I think they should be fired, only that they should have known better than to have those conversations on a system operated by the fucking NSA.)

[–] voytrekk@sopuli.xyz 4 points 6 hours ago

The people working in intelligence are not always the smartest, especially when it comes to technology.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

“Someone might want to let Chris Rufo know that many of the best coders, hackers, and cryptographers are LGBTQ. The neurodivergent talent required for these skills often comes with divergence from the mean in other areas.”

Hrm. While I'm very sympathetic to their plight here I also hate this "Big Bang Theory" stereotype of people who work in technical fields.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago
[–] boydster@sh.itjust.works 25 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

First they came for the T's

And I did not speak out

Because I was not a T

Then they came for the LGB's

And I did not speak out

Because I was not a LGB

Then they came for the immigrants

And I did not speak out

Because I was not an immigrant

And then they came for the non-Christians

And I did not speak out

Because I was not a non-Christian

And then they came for me

And there was no one left

To speak out for me

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 11 points 5 hours ago

I'm going to hazard a guess that if they had been hating on trans people and culture, or promoting conservative values, in that work chat tool then they would still have jobs.

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 6 points 5 hours ago

Russian Asset says what?

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 5 points 5 hours ago

This Cruella De Vil looking twat was no business in the Intel world when any given one of those people have more knowledge of actual security matters than she could even begin to comprehend.

[–] Veedem@lemmy.world -5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Oooooph. These people are fools for using a work app to talk about that crap.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds like it was an app like slack or teams where you talk to your colleagues. That doesn't seem like a weird thing to me if you are friends with someone at work you discuss your life with them.

[–] Veedem@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

I had a teams app at my previous gig and I was very close with the people in that app, but if it wasn’t work related, that conversation happened over iMessage, not in teams where the company had access