this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
689 points (98.6% liked)

News

25357 readers
5548 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 13 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Project 2025 will create the Christian Taliban. I highly doubt the dumb fuck female MAGA voters will realize what they voted for.

[–] MilitantAtheist@lemmy.world 2 points 58 minutes ago

Under his eye

[–] gamer@lemm.ee 15 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

My prediction for a future military incel recruitment poster:

Join the America Russia North Korea (ARNK) alliance in our war against the WOKE DEI Euro Chinese Soros COMMUNIST SCOURGE and you will be guaranteed a VIRGIN wife! ENLIST TODAY!

[–] Zink@programming.dev 3 points 1 hour ago

Shorten it to just ARK and it will be even more on the nose with a biblical reference!

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Heinlein couldn’t have written it better.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

True, all humans are like children. Maybe AI should take over.

[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 1 points 31 minutes ago* (last edited 31 minutes ago)

Surviving humans, take note:

Per Syndicate rules, subsection 543 of the Precious Elemental Reserves Code, having failed to file a proper appeal for mineral and elemental rights within 50 solars of first contact, your planet has been successfully seized and is currently being mined of all requested elemental deposits by the assigned planetary regent.

Every interior of your world has been crushed and all raw materials-organic and inanimate-are in the process of being mined for the requested elements.

Per the Mined Material Reclamation Act along with subsection 35 of the Indigenous Planetary Species Protection Act, any surviving humans will be given the opportunity to reclaim their lost matter. The Borant Corporation, having been assigned regency over this solar system, is allowed to choose the manner of this reclamation, and they have chosen option 3, also known as the 18-Level World Dungeon. The Borant Corporation retains all rights to broadcast, exploit, and otherwise control all aspects of the World Dungeon and will remain in control as long as they adhere to Syndicate regulations regarding world resource reclamation.

Upon successful completion of level 18 of the World Dungeon, regency of this planet will revert to the successor.

A Syndicate neutral observer AI-myself-has been created and dispatched to this planet to supervise the creation of the World Dungeon and to ensure all the rules and regulations are properly followed.

Please pay careful attention to the following information as it will not be repeated.

Per the Indigenous Planetary Species Protection Act, all remaining materials-estimated to be 99.999999% of the sifted matter-is currently being repurposed for the subterranean World Dungeon. The first level of this dungeon will open approximately 18 seconds after the end of this announcement. The first-level entrances will be open for exactly one human hour and one hour only. Once the entrances are closed, you may no longer enter. If you enter, you may not leave until you have either completed all 18 levels of the World Dungeon or if you meet certain other requirements.

[–] Birch@sh.itjust.works 58 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I can't help but think of how this cartoon from the beginning of November got it completely backward

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 22 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Eh not really getting the idea across:

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 66 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 20 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Ah yes, that sends the right mix of feelings.

[–] Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 21 points 4 hours ago

Damn, it gets worse every week

[–] Juice@midwest.social 30 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

What if wanting to believe that there is some nice place that good people go when they die, leads people to support the mass murder and immiseration of countless women, children, queer people and BIPOC?

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 11 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Religion is, and probably always has been a means of control. That's not to say that it is that at every level, or that it's only that. Religion is designed to bring you comfort and assistance in your times of need, while charging you a fee for the service. The business has to run, the staff and bills have to be paid, the top officers need to be fabulously wealthy. Not all religions are against Women, Children, BIPOC, and LGBTQ, but if you're trying to exert control, they make easy scapegoats. White men make all the money, Let us hold down all these minorities so you can smother them to make yourself feel better, now pay us.

One of my friends attends and assists with a great little church. It's a small, modest community church. The pastor is gay, and drag queens come to read stories occasionally. The place is just kept up with. They're not squeezing 30% out of the community. I'm not one for church, but I approve of what they're doing wholly.

Religion also conditions you to out source your moral judgements. This allows someone to use their authority to convince people of immoral things.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 74 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

Imagine how little self-respect you'd have to have to be a woman and vote Republican.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 16 points 4 hours ago

Well surely it was never going to affect them. They are one of the good ones, it's the others that need to be controlled. Why would they ever come for me if I am living a proper God fearing life?

[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 31 points 6 hours ago

Making sure that women have very little self-respect is one of the primary functions of American Evangelicalism.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

They unironically think Harris was some kind of monster and that it was all worth it to keep trans out of sports.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 hours ago

"I didn't realize there were more than 2 lines to the poem.'

-MAGAts

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

There are willing to become tradwife after all.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 81 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

This isn't a leaopards eating faces thing for republican women. These women derive social, economic, and political benefits through their association with the men who hold power in our patriarchal system. By aligning with backwards gender roles or evil ideologies, they feel protected and valued within the system even as it restricts their autonomy. They know what they're doing.

[–] halykthered@lemmy.ml 26 points 6 hours ago

I read years ago that white republican women will put up with being treated as lesser in their circles in order to treat others as lesser. So they're fine with being spoken down to and shuffled aside so they can feel free to yell at minorities.

[–] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

They do, but there is an assumption that the relationship between women like that and the wealthy ruling class men they attach themselves to is reciprocal. It, of course, is not.

Take the woman who has a child by Elon Musk. Her and Musk had a romantic getaway and brief liason. She clearly wasn't upset at being pregnant by him. There was an assumption that she'd be cared for. Even if not directly, indirectly. She definitely did not anticipate that she would actually be confined to an apartment 24 hours a day, entirely neglected without any contact from the father of her child. Nor that she'd be left with a child to raise on her own, and no support either financial or emotional or in terms of literal labor.

Call her ignorant and bigoted, both are valid criticisms. But she absolutely was not anticipating this outcome. There is a presumption from conservative/fascist women that they occupy a position of hierarchy over non-fascist/non-conservative women. That by virtue of supporting fascism and patriarchy that fascist men will afford them personhood. They don't believe in any of the assertions of feminism. They instead believe that women who suffer at the hands of men simply deserve it. That all women are judged in some kind of meritocracy, where belief in fascism and support of fascists itself is a determining factor of merit.

They are infuriatingly wrong. But do not be so quick to mischaracterize all conservative/fascist women as knowingly participating in the elimination of their own rights. They are systematically indoctrinated. Inexcusably, I will add. There is no justification for supporting fascists, no justification for supporting violence against women. To combat the ideology they espouse it is crucial to understand not just what they say but what they think.

[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 12 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

There is a presumption from conservative/fascist women that they occupy a position of hierarchy over non-fascist/non-conservative women. That by virtue of supporting fascism and patriarchy that fascist men will afford them personhood. They don't believe in any of the assertions of feminism. They instead believe that women who suffer at the hands of men simply deserve it. That all women are judged in some kind of meritocracy, where belief in fascism and support of fascists itself is a determining factor of merit.

This may be true for some women, maybe in the "tradwife" and white supremacist circles. But if, as you say, it's critical to understand what these women think, you have to understand that they are not a monolith. There are other motivations to consider.

I was raised in a fundamentalist, evangelical church. Within that community, there was no presumption of a hierarchical position over other women. There was only our god-given position to be subservient to our fathers, and later, our husbands. We could either obey the divine plan to someday reach heaven or disobey it and be resigned to hell. There was no in-between.

Now, a reasonable person would see this as patently ridiculous. But the problem is that reason has no place in this worldview. You doggedly follow a literal interpretation of the King James Bible, or you go to hell.

Many years ago, when I was 16, I had asked for a particular privilege. And my mother agreed to grant it if I would listen to some audio tapes that she had of a series of sermons from a woman. Now, that was unusual in itself, because women are not allowed to teach men within fundamentalist churches (Because The Bible Says So™). So this was definitely a teaching that was only meant for women. What I heard was horrifying.

The entire point of this sermon series was to teach women how to be good, submissive Christian wives. The lesson of one tape was literally that if your husband commanded you to commit murder, you would have to do it, because God put him in charge of you and your duty to God was simply to follow orders from your husband.

A woman would not be judged for breaking a commandment if she followed the direction of her husband. The husband would be punished for causing someone to break God's commandments, but the wife would be spared because she was simply doing her duty as a wife to follow what her husband said.

Women's agency is completely removed in this scenario. Which sounds exactly like what the men described in the article want.

Again, the problem here is that reason has no purchase in this worldview. No amount of evidence or argument is going to change their minds or magically give them a sense of agency.

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Can confirm, was also raised as a woman in a fundamentalist church. We didn't stick just to the KJV, but then the pastor would turn around and preach out of LaHay's Left Behind series too, soooooo.

When I was 17, I went to a youth christian convention, and during the main speaker, they had the thousands of teens and 20somes in the audience participate in a mass marriage to god. They said that god would provide a good husband for me.

Then I got raped and made the mistake of turning to the bible for comfort. The bible says that women who get raped in the city should be put to death, and women who get raped outside the city need to marry their rapist. Now, the text I read made it sound like it wasn't really the location, but whether or not she screamed, and I had screamed, so I reasoned that I needed to marry the man instead of killing myself.

[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I am so sorry that happened to you and that the place where you turned for help just added to your trauma.

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 hour ago

Well, good news is that I've been out of that fuggin cult for nearly 20 years now, and therapy has done so much more for me than religion ever has.

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Damn, I saw the same kind of thing. Most of the non denominational churches are poisoning society for a sliver of power, if only over the women.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 13 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Is there a meme of Margaret Atwood looking horrified yet? Because there should be.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Nice, maybe this is the extra little push for some turncoats in congress.

load more comments
view more: next ›