this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
360 points (99.2% liked)

News

25357 readers
5548 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Three federal judges dealt legal setbacks to Trump’s early second-term controversial policies in a 90-minute span.

In DC, Judge AliKhan indefinitely blocked a federal funding freeze, calling it “irrational, imprudent and precipitated a nationwide crisis.”

Also in DC, Judge Amir Ali ordered the administration to pay pay foreign aid-related money owed to government contractors and nonprofit groups.

In Seattle, Judge Whitehead halted Trump’s executive order suspending refugee admissions, arguing it “amounts to an effective nullification of congressional will.”

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bfg9k@lemmy.world 18 points 5 hours ago

Wake me up when he's behind bars.

Nothing will fucking happen.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 9 points 4 hours ago

Law means nothing.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago

So that means he's being put in a cell?

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 14 points 8 hours ago

Yeah, but out of how many? And how many things has he done that should be in a court right now, but they aren't?

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 33 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

"I've made my ruling! Now tell the people who work for you to enforce it on you."

[–] ClanOfTheOcho@lemmy.world 11 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Stupid Andrew Jackson and his stupid horse face making things difficult centuries later.

[–] booly@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Andrew Jackson's statement that he would have refused to have the executive branch enforce the Supreme Court's ruling was dangerous, but it ended up not mattering in practice. The losing party in that case was the State of Georgia, and Georgia ended up complying with the court orders.

If Trump starts ordering the executive branch to disobey court orders, it may set up a crisis, and it might be one that he doesn't win. His own loyalists appointed to the heads of the departments and agencies might listen to him, but the actual rank and file of who needs to implement the orders could end up in open revolt. After all, even the military has it ingrained that one only needs to obey lawful orders, not unlawful ones.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 hours ago

The governor's ball a few days ago saw a whole group of military soldiers singing a Les Mis song instead of whatever it was they planned. I doubt the military would comply with unconstitutional orders; despite the fact that the president is commander-in-chief, they still swore an oath to uphold the Constitution.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 47 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

And that means, , nothing at all because your system is broken and you have no law

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

They have selectively enforced law

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

"selectively" as in "in a way that won't stop nor deter trump"

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

As in: you are billionaire - no penalty, you are pleb - full force of law

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago
[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 102 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Cool, now who enforces? crickets

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

It can even be enforced, but it doesn't matter, because there's no real drawback from these rulings. He can sign 100 executive orders a day, and that will go to 100 courtrooms and take them weeks or more to sort out.

He can just keep pumping these out all day, it's a "throw as much shit at the wall as possible" situation, some of it is going to stick.

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 53 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

So that's three judges about to get DOGEd.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Republicans will open investigations and impeachments against them all.

[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 1 points 5 hours ago

If they’re taking up time doing this, its less time to write shit legislation.

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

So much winning!