this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
208 points (99.5% liked)

News

25357 readers
5548 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to release billions of dollars in blocked foreign aid within 48 hours, citing noncompliance with a 13-day-old court order.

The freeze, imposed by Trump's Jan. 20 executive order, halted funding for USAID and State Department programs, affecting hundreds of millions of dollars owed to nonprofits and businesses.

The cutoff forced tens of thousands of layoffs and jeopardized critical aid projects. Despite the Feb. 13 ruling, no payments resumed.

This follows another case where a judge found the administration failed to unfreeze trillions in domestic grants and loans.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LMurch@thelemmy.club 1 points 16 minutes ago

Trump gonna slap 25% tariffs on the judges. That'll teach them, MAGA!

[–] tamal3@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

What is the date and time required by the judge? That is PROTEST O'CLOCK, my people.

[–] nomoredrama@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Or what? The judge doesn't have the power to enforce it. The president has greater power than the judge. The judge shouldn't even be involved to begin with. The executive order trumps the judges order.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

you're wrong and let me explain why.

a judge rules with the force of laws. this is because they work within the judicial branch. these laws are written, voted, and accepted as truth. laws are practically stricken in stone.

executive orders are orders given to how the government should operate, not how they will operate. without laws to back the EO the order is worth as much as an Arby's receipt. they are not royal proclamations because America does not have a king.

Trump and his bastards have broken several hundred if not thousands of laws all under the guise of executive privilege which has ZERO legal standing in court. and before you bring scotus into this, they don't make the laws they merely interpret them and how they should be interpreted. it's up to the lower courts and judges to apply or ignore laws as they have been interpreted.

so to recap: executive orders are not laws, they cannot be interpreted by scotus and thus can be ignored or even challenged by the lower courts.

as for what the judges can do, they can hold him in contempt, arrest him, and place him in custody for not complying with the law.

hopefully you've learned something and can be less ignorant about a subject you seem so passionate about.

[–] half_fiction@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Redditsux@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago

Traditions don't work with bullies. Trump is exposing every weakness in the US institutions.

[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 58 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Whatcha gonna do, judge? Ask again? Wait until deadlines pass? Delay has always been Trumpy Dumpty's strategy to maximize harm. No conquences means nothing to lose.

But instead of poking a dictator who doesn't GAF, how about holding congress Republicans accountable since, you know, they "control" finances. You start dragging them out in cuffs, I betcha it will get someone's attention, fast!

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 35 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (3 children)

The next step is the DoJ sends the US Marshalls to arrest the President for failure to comply with a federal court order. Let’s hope they follow through.

Congress is not withholding the funds, so they are not committing a crime. That’s part of the reason for the accountability executive order, obscuring responsibility.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 21 points 14 hours ago

The DoJ is an executive agency, under the President, currently run by Pam Bondi and Emil Bove. Anyone in that organization who moves against the President is getting fired, whether or not that is legal.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 15 hours ago

And just like that, Trump fires the US Marshalls.

[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 13 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Interesting. I suppose it being an executive order does keep it to the executive branch. It's late over here and the brain hurts.

Too bad there isn't a law that requires the legislative brance to exercise powers of checks and balances. Maybe that's something to note for America 2.0.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 16 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

The federal courts took the first step, ruling the action unconstitutional. We’ll see if the DoJ dispatches the US Marshalls with a warrant for failure to comply. If not, they will be complicit.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The courts can directly order the Marshalls to enforce their rulings. But yes,the Marshalls do roll up under the DOJ. So what happens when the courts give the order is anyone's guess.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Failure would result in a constitutional crisis.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Another one? Toss it on the pile.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

There hasn’t been one yet. It’s defined as a situation in which a major political dispute cannot be clearly resolved on the basis of the particular government’s constitution or established practice. All steps must be taken until our system has been proven to fail.

[–] lectricleopard@lemmy.world 33 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

What are they gonna do? Prosecute him? Impeach him? Hold him in contempt?

Dudes been stealing from everyone for his whole life and doesn't give a fuck what a judge thinks.

[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Ha! We both said the same thing.

First bump

[–] don@lemm.ee 5 points 17 hours ago

First bump

I knew what you meant. Autocorrect do be an asshole.