489
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] thal3s@sh.itjust.works 112 points 1 year ago

Former President Donald Trump's top White House trade adviser Peter Navarro was found guilty Thursday of two counts of criminal contempt of Congress for defying a subpoena from the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.

A jury in Washington, D.C., convicted the former Trump administration official following a trial that lasted just over a day. Navarro's defense team called no witnesses.

Sentencing is set for January, and Navarro faces a maximum of one year in prison and a fine of $100,000 for each count.

Good, now do all the others.

[-] athos77@kbin.social 104 points 1 year ago

It needs to be prison time, otherwise it's just the cost of doing business.

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 73 points 1 year ago

If the punishment is a fine, it's only illegal for poor people.

Hence why all sentences are and/or. Fine of $100,000 and/or 1 year old prison.

It's the same in every state and federal application to my knowledge.

[-] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Agreed. But OP was saying there needs to be some time in the mix.

[-] girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

The article clearly states that he faces jail time AND a fine, not OR a fine.

[-] TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

1 year is the worst he can get? Hopefully it is prison time as that fine is a joke.

[-] solidgrue@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

Dunno about the rest of you, but I've been enjoying the Find Out phase immensely.

[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago
[-] mjhelto@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

Agreed, but only if it can happen before the orange shit-stain has a chance to run next year. If his name is put on the ballot, then removed due to disqualification (for insurance), the flurry of fat-ass, mouth breathing troglodytes with gun fetishes will be deafening spitting conspiracy theories and refusing, even more, to ignore the election results and turn the whole process into even more of a headache.

[-] Jackolantern@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

He’s now in the FO stage of FAFO

[-] halferect@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Not really, the guy is worth 5-6 million dollars so this won't scare him at all. He will get a fine and pay it then go on his merry way

[-] kaitco@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Is it an either/or on the prison time and fine? I read it as fine and min 30 days of time, going up to a year.

[-] halferect@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

It's a fine and possibly a year in prison for each count. But the judge can rule no jail time and just fines which is what I'm betting is what will happen.

[-] kaitco@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Sigh…there’s no real justice these days, is there?

[-] halferect@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I would love to be wrong but our justice system is made to help rich people break the law with little to no repercussions.

[-] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

The US has a Legal system, not a Justice system.

[-] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

And a year in prison for these people ends up being no actual time, or it's a few weekends in a club.

[-] FReddit@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Nothing is going to happen to any of these assholes.

There's a different set of rules for rich, white assholes.

Disclosure: white and broke here.

[-] fsr1967@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Bannon got a prison sentence. But he's out while waiting for his appeal, unlike broke folk. So he might see a consequence.

[-] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 12 points 1 year ago

If he called no witnesses, I wonder of this is where secret Trump pardons begin appearing. It would certainly explain everyone’s eagerness to demand they be tried in Federal Courts.

[-] Wrench@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

You mean in case Trump wins back the presidency? Because you can't do future pardons. The chance to pardon has passed, and that fuck isn't getting the presidency again

[-] girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

He'd better get 2 yrs in jail and a $200k fine.

[-] Moghie@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Do you think if he had testified, he would have also been indicted for Jan 6th crimes? Maybe it was strategic. Better to get a possible 2 year max prison sentence than what he could have gotten with RICO charges. I have no idea how involved he was with the insurrection though, it's just a thought I had.

[-] lemmefixdat4u@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

He could have availed himself of his 5th Amendment right. Would have made him look guilty in the public's eyes, but he would have been no worse off legally. And now that he's convicted of contempt, Congress could subpoena him again. Rinse and repeat.

[-] Moghie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks for responding! Glad I'm not a defense lawyer lol

[-] iHUNTcriminals@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Let him be known forever as a dork-ass!

[-] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

OMG, we're finally seeing some consequences (assuming the sentencing isn't a slap on the wrist). It's been so frustrating.

this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
489 points (99.2% liked)

News

22955 readers
4786 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS